A place to explore my wierd thoughts

"Godard got it exactly backwards. Cinema is not truth 24 times a second, it is lies 24 times a second. Actors are pretending to be people they’re not, in situations and settings which are completely illusory. Day for night, dry for wet, Vancouver for New York, potato shavings for snow. The building is a thin-walled set, the sunlight is a Xenon, and the traffic noise is supplied by the sound designers. It’s all illusion, but the prize goes to those who make the fantasy the most real, the most visceral, the most involving. This sensation of truthfulness is vastly enhanced by the stereoscopic illusion."

- ~ James Cameron in 2008 (via directingfilm)
Source: directingfilm

Neil Gaiman: For all the people who ask me for writing advice...

neil-gaiman:

Neil Gaiman

1 Write.

2 Put one word after another. Find the right word, put it down.

3 Finish what you’re writing. Whatever you have to do to finish it, finish it.

4 Put it aside. Read it pretending you’ve never read it before. Show it to friends whose opinion you respect and who like…

Source: Guardian

Source: melazcosmo

directingfilm:

Is It Time To Let Moviegoers Send Texts During A Film? 
IMAX’s Greg Foster seemed to like the idea of relaxing the absolute ban on phone use in theaters. His 17-year-old son “constantly has his phone with him,” he says. “We want them to pay $12 to $14 to come into an auditorium and watch a movie. But they’ve become accustomed to controlling their own existence.” Banning cell phone use may make them “feel a little handcuffed.”
I can’t say that I’m thrilled that we’re at this juncture in filmgoing, but it’s a discussion that needs to be had.  First of all, if Greg Foster’s son compulsively checks his phone, it means that his son has little sense of agency - the phone is controlling his existence.  That’s the larger issue at play.  I don’t think it is a teenage thing either.  I have gone to films with fellow filmmakers in their late 20s and have seen them respond to non-urgent texts during a film.
Classical music venues have been facing issues such as these for decades.  As the audience ages, they wonder how to bring younger people to listen to pieces by Bach, Mozart, Ligeti, and Glass.  They discuss amplification, allowing or encouraging audience participation, and relaxing the dress code.
I suppose I’m not concerned about these issues.  The etiquette will work itself out.  I know what I like, however.  I like to focus on beautiful pieces of music.  I love to dive into a great film.  I want to engage a piece of art and not concern myself about what I have to do later, who I should be texting etc… In other words, I enjoy handing myself over to something else.  I honestly feel bad for those people that can’t relax and go a few hours without checking their phone.  
In the end, it’s simply a matter of education and experience.  Telling people NOT to do something only encourages it.  Showing them the joys of contemplation, focus, and engagement will do more to combat the compulsions of the Distracted Generation more than any rule possibly could.
It reminds me of this book by Eric Siblin, a pop and rock music critic that discovered Bach later in life.  Like so many others that are not raised knowing the joy of Bach’s work, once he was formally introduced and really understood how to listen to the music, he was enchanted.  So much so that he switched gears entirely and wrote a beautiful biography of this experience called The Cello Suites: J. S. Bach, Pablo Casals, and the Search for a Baroque Masterpiece.
This is incredibly common.  People ignore Bach because they don’t understand it. People text because it is habitual.  If you want people not to text in a theater, simply show them how liberating it can be to free yourself from this compulsion.  Rules are made to be broken.  Habits are too.
~ü
[Image: The Invisible Cinema designed by Peter Kubelka]
[Quote: David Lieberman, Is It Time To Let Moviegoers Send Texts During A Film?: CinemaCon]

directingfilm:

Is It Time To Let Moviegoers Send Texts During A Film? 

IMAX’s Greg Foster seemed to like the idea of relaxing the absolute ban on phone use in theaters. His 17-year-old son “constantly has his phone with him,” he says. “We want them to pay $12 to $14 to come into an auditorium and watch a movie. But they’ve become accustomed to controlling their own existence.” Banning cell phone use may make them “feel a little handcuffed.”

I can’t say that I’m thrilled that we’re at this juncture in filmgoing, but it’s a discussion that needs to be had.  First of all, if Greg Foster’s son compulsively checks his phone, it means that his son has little sense of agency - the phone is controlling his existence.  That’s the larger issue at play.  I don’t think it is a teenage thing either.  I have gone to films with fellow filmmakers in their late 20s and have seen them respond to non-urgent texts during a film.

Classical music venues have been facing issues such as these for decades.  As the audience ages, they wonder how to bring younger people to listen to pieces by Bach, Mozart, Ligeti, and Glass.  They discuss amplification, allowing or encouraging audience participation, and relaxing the dress code.

I suppose I’m not concerned about these issues.  The etiquette will work itself out.  I know what I like, however.  I like to focus on beautiful pieces of music.  I love to dive into a great film.  I want to engage a piece of art and not concern myself about what I have to do later, who I should be texting etc… In other words, I enjoy handing myself over to something else.  I honestly feel bad for those people that can’t relax and go a few hours without checking their phone.  

In the end, it’s simply a matter of education and experience.  Telling people NOT to do something only encourages it.  Showing them the joys of contemplation, focus, and engagement will do more to combat the compulsions of the Distracted Generation more than any rule possibly could.

It reminds me of this book by Eric Siblin, a pop and rock music critic that discovered Bach later in life.  Like so many others that are not raised knowing the joy of Bach’s work, once he was formally introduced and really understood how to listen to the music, he was enchanted.  So much so that he switched gears entirely and wrote a beautiful biography of this experience called The Cello Suites: J. S. Bach, Pablo Casals, and the Search for a Baroque Masterpiece.

This is incredibly common.  People ignore Bach because they don’t understand it. People text because it is habitual.  If you want people not to text in a theater, simply show them how liberating it can be to free yourself from this compulsion.  Rules are made to be broken.  Habits are too.

[Image: The Invisible Cinema designed by Peter Kubelka]

[Quote: David Lieberman, Is It Time To Let Moviegoers Send Texts During A Film?: CinemaCon]

Source: directingfilm

  • Question: WHAT IS YOUR FAVOURITE FOOTBALL TEAM? - Anonymous
  • Answer:

    Batman

just-art:

Paper Realities by Jan Kriwol

Artist: Tumblr / Website 

Source: just-art

(via penishole)

Source: funnyjunk.com

Click to watch "Looper" trailer

Since I brought up Looper in the last post I figured I`d post it here. Gonna watch the shit out of this movie.

Text

Adam is 27 years old and works as a writer for radio programs and gets diagnosed with a rare spinal cancer. Together with his friend, parents and therapisthe goes through a time which teaches him what is the important things in life.


I first heard about this movie as a “movie about this dude who gets cancer” so I wasn`t really interested since it didn`t sound like anything special. Later, when I watched Pretty Much It on youtube they highly reccomended it. I always agree with those guys on everything so I figured I would give it a shot. The movie is a comedy about a man who goes through the experience of getting a rare form of cancer. Yes, a comedy.

Adams relationship with his best friend, Kyle, played by Seth Rogen is where the comedy is strongest. The comedy is very natural and mostly with dialoge instead of actions. This suites the movie very well and makes it seem very down to earth. His therapist ,Katherine, played by Anna Kendrick has some scenes that might make u giggle. Overall the comedy did not dissapoint.

The most interesting part about the movie is that it is a very sad story and the comedy isn`t trying to make it anything else then what it is. I won`t dig too much into what happens but I must say I recommend it very much and Joseph Gordon-Levitt is probably one of my favourite actors after watching this (can`t wait for Looper).

I am not sure what kind of rating system I will use in the future but for now I will just say, I am going to buy this movie. On blueray. No doubt.

Source: annicka